Click here for Urdu Version Full Text of Judgement In the Islamabad High Court, Islamabad Judicial Department Writ Petition N. 1585 of 2008 Iftikhar Hussain Rajput Versus Government of Pakistan etc. Barrister Syed Muhammad Javed Iqbal Jafree Advocate for petitioner. Mr. Amjad Iqbal Qureshi, DAG for respondents No. 1,2,3,7 and 10. Read full text... Glaring flaws in Farah case verdict The Islamabad High Court (IHC) verdict in the Farah Hameed Dogar case, handed down on Friday, is full of flaws, discrepancies, inconsistencies and inaccuracies. The verdict does not address a host of mind-boggling questions. A careful reading of the 14-page decision shows, on page 7, that the judge - confusing re-checking with re-assessment - gives a misplaced ruling: “Bare reading shows that an embargo has been placed on re-assessment of any answer book until publication of the result of the board examination.” Read full text... Text of petition Grounds: (i) Breach of trusts and Exploitation are forbidden by the Constitution; See Article 1-8; 10-14, 18, 24-25, 40, 22, 232 and obstructs justice and subverts the Constitution (ii) Not acknowledging or replying to letters is illegal per Section 24A General Clauses Act and the Constitution Art. 2A,3 (See p., 578, Vol. 6, Muarriffe Quran); it also has promoted bad governance and is most detrimental to the welfare and future and credibility of Pakistan; Read full text... Farah Dogar got two marks out of one! By Ansar Abbasi Monday, January 19, 2009 The two samples of Miss Farah Hameed Dogar's answer sheets reveal another aspect of scandalous jacking up of her marks. The answer sheets were made part of the Islamabad High Court's recent judgment to prove “irregularities” that were cited as the reason for the re-assessment of her papers. In one case pertaining to the paper of Physics II, despite her answer being incorrect, Miss Farah was given two marks while that part carried only one mark. In case of Urdu paper, despite making four mistakes in a two-line answer, she was given two marks out of three. Read full text...   Submit Your Comments    Name  *    Email  *    City  *    Country  *    Message  *    Enter Code

What is your opinion? Members of the academic and legal fraternity are requested to peruse the legal petition lodged against awarding additional marks to Ms Farah Dogar, the decision of the Islamabad High Court and both the articles of Ansar Abbasi. Their valued opinions will be published in The News and Daily Jang, broadcast on Geo TV, as well as printed on the websites of The News and Daily Jang. It is imperative for the survival, protection and advancement of any civilised society to ensure that justice is served to all citizens without any discrimination. We would urge you to contribute an informed opinion in this matter of national importance. Please email your opinion to: Karachi Lahore Rawalpindi Fax: 021-2640583 Fax: 042-6360866 Fax: 051-5503661